"The president of the United States is not a fact-checker."
who said that, according to the post? "The official conducting the briefing rejected reporters' entreaties to allow his name to be used, arguing that it was his standard procedure for such sessions to be conducted anonymously."
i don't think i'd put my name with that claim, either. not if the guy-whose-facts-should-pretty-much-be-right-on-in-chief was my boss.
in other news, did everyone get a chance to listen to yesterday's fight in the house ways and means committee? i somehow caught a good bit of its aftermath on c-span in the afternoon. there were capitol police and everything!
sheesh.
Posted by dave at July 19, 2003 8:54 AM | TrackBack