well.
not sure what to call it. not sure what to say. i've read these things for a while, now, and, like you (wow. that's downright presumptuous!) [insert knowing discourse on the dynamic relationship between bloggist and anonymous, yet somehow tangible consumer], i have favorites. every bit as important to me as the washington post. this morning, on a radio network i listen to and cite, on average, 8.4 times per day, i heard a piece in which [media critic] boldly argued that blogs are at least partly responsible for the editorial sea change at the ny times.
pause was given.
i think what i'll do with this (already once renamed) weblog (i hear the kids are calling them blogs... that can be our secret) is to do my best to avoid experiment, to let theory fly, to resist worry, and to fiendishly ignore the preceding three rules. and probably to talk to myself often (because, let's face it, who doesn't love reading that?).
Posted by dave at June 8, 2003 10:05 AMI just found your site and must tell you I enjoyed you rambles. Intelligent rambles. Best monologues of the day. Thanks.
Posted by: kim at July 28, 2003 10:54 PM | Permalink to Commentthank you. good of you to comment. i aspire to ramble. intelligence is less promising, i think.
Posted by: dave at July 29, 2003 6:40 PM | Permalink to Comment